Macedonia Nexus: The Identity of All Global Hellenes
by
Convener: George Savva Eleftheriades OAM, CETr, JP
July 17, 2007
Dear fellow Hellenes, fellow Europeans, and fellow humans:
THE IDENTITY CRISIS OF THE SKOPJANS [Skopians]
Skopjans Identity Crisis started when Tito of Yugoslavia aspired to extend his communist control over northern Hellas (Greece) to a sea exit on the warm waters of the Aegean Sea, also to share that sea exit with the fellow-communist regimes of the Communist International Commintern during the post-2WW East-West cold war hostilities. As the Yugoslav Socialist Republic of Vardaria-Banovina bordered on the historical Macedonia of the Hellenes, Tito transformed Vardaria to a Yugoslav Macedonia and pressed for integration of all parts, including Macedonia Aegeanska (i.e., ours of Northern Hellas), and Macedonia Pirrin of Bulgaria, to form a greater Macedonia communist country: that being a strategic plan of communist access-expansion into the Aegean and the Mediterranean Seas.
The biggest lie of the century
To contend that their history dates back to the times of the Macedonian dynasty, Skopjan Slavs are committing historical frauds. History records their advent in that region many centuries after Christ: never before. To overcome this historical revelation they further contend that their non-Slavic Macedonian nation had been there and that in the course of history they had lost their being, somehow they were Slavicised and lately re-emerged Macedonian contenders. But history does not hold any other Homeric account of any Odyssey of Skopjo-Macedonians -- a likely fairytale. On the contrary, there are Hellenic evidences in every stage of history. Please read Hellenic Evidence further down below.
__________
Instantly under their fanciful name, their education was directed to superficially create the original Macedonian nation by distorting world history -- altering their names from Bulgaric terminations of ev or eff as in Ivanov, Ivanoff or Fadeyeff to the non-Bulgaric vic as in Ivanovic -- to differentiate from their Bulgarian kin-people and thus pretending they are restoring their long lost nationality. Recently they are replacing the Cyrillic characters with their newly invented A-be-ce-dar, thus to cease using the Cyrillic and (Hellenic term) Alphabet. A wanton nation-making process like the Hebrews applied for establishing their nation of Israel from a variety of Jewish
people; Ashkenazim, Shephardim, etc.
N.B. Saints Kyrillos and Methodios were missionaries from Byzantine Macedonia who brought Christ to the Slavs. They also devised the Cyrillic alphabet; their scripture characters based on the Hellenic (and added some 16 more letters). Some years ago, in observance of this, EU proclaimed them Patron Saints of Europe.
All these actions during the "cold war" were overlooked by the Hellenes (the historically genuine Macedonians) for four decades, until the new generations of Vardarians grew up forty years brainwashed into believing they are the original Macedonians and that Hellenes had seized their history and distorted it. That Yugoslav micro-nation of less than 2 millions of mainly shepherds, tsombanos, got a jolt from nothingness to the lost glories of the Macedonian conquest and world grandeur, which their national destiny demands reclaiming; a veritable IDENTITY CRISIS. Crisis it is because the contending Macedonians are some half of its population and are Slavs who speak the west Bulgarian dialect, two fifths are Albanians (calling themselves llyrians), and the rest are a pan-spermia of Serbs, Bulgars, Bosnians, Vlachs, Gypsies-Romanies, some Hellenes, and immigrants from the Eastern block, Asia, Africa, etc.
Currently, ignoring the decencies of good neighbourhood, they pursue large scale projects, which seriously offend Hellenes, reportedly for:
a) to glorify their Great King and,
b) to punish the Hellenes who stole their glorious achievements and distort their history.
Pertinently, Hellenes have a saying: “The donkey called the cockerel a . . . big-head.”
Having renamed theirs to Great Alexander Airport, Skopjans are further corrupting world
history. They are erecting statues of Great Alexander and renaming towns to Pella, Ptolemy, Cleopatra, and Alexandria, to superficially claim a dominating place in world history. One can imagine where this ridiculous comedy tends to end. One sure argument is that Skopjans are emboldened and receiving instructions from Zionist elements of the USA Administration, which are orchestrated by their world syndicates about what to do, thus to pursue more defiant falsehoods, purporting by persistent lies to eventually unseat the historical truths, in their favour.
__________
Our valid reasons in alleging the latter, emanate from the extremely anti-Hellenic dogma of Henry Kissinger which, inter allia, includes, we must knock them hard at their history . . . to weaken them so as not to be able to resist, . . . etc.” In other words, they contrive to strip us from all our historical and cultural legacies.[Editorial remark: The issue at hand exposes the unfortunate and intractable stigma on U.S. dignity and prestige for being led and implicated in an activity ranked as repugnant and unacceptable by all cherished American standards and ideals].
We are witnessing this now being pursued in many anti-Hellenic hostilities, as follows:
1. Skopje, in the large scale distortion of our Macedonian legacies; and, coincidentally, the issue of new textbooks for distorting the Hellenic national history.
2. Turkey, in Constantinople, the annihilation of millions indigenous Hellenes and the harassment of the Ecumenical Patriarchate; the continued closure of the Orthodox Theological College; the disregard of the Ecumenical Patriarchate status in the world church; the confiscating of Patriarchal properties by the Turkish Department of
the Wakfs; and over the Hellenic Aegean islands; its aggressing air incursions.
3. Cyprus: USA, British, and other Westerns tolerating the continued 33 years old aggression of Turkey of the northern part the island republic (EU member country), and their silent propping up of the quisling regime; their dealings with the illegal: trade, refugees’ properties, institutions, and universities.
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
Nevertheless, concerning the Macedonian parody, there are serious faults on our Hellenes’ side, evolving over six decades, viz:
1. Hellas did not wake up to this affront, did not react, and not protested (partly because the NATO allies lulled her so as not to offend Tito who had downgraded his political ties with Moscow). This Hellenic mistake lasted over forty years after Tito and the communist Commintern (communist international) renamed the Yugoslav Vardarska Banovina to Republica Macedoniy, purporting a communist territorial expansion over the historically legitimate Makedonia of the Hellenes.
2. After Yugoslavia collapsed, Hellas agreed that the new state be admitted in the UNO under the provisional name of Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia (its acronym FYROM). Hellas’ mistake was that the term Macedonia featured in the provisional name, which enabled FYROM to use this Macedonia feature as its constitutional name, and enabled many other countries -- for obtaining privileges and trade contracts in FYROM -- to rename it to Republic of Macedonia. Here again Hellas did not protest that this renaming was contrary to the UNO resolutions on the name dispute
3a. While Skopje established the term Macedonia solely as the constitutional name of its country, Athens kept the term only as the name of just a province: its historically legitimate Macedonia. Thus other countries or foreign enterprises would expediently recognise a country rather than a province of a similar name.
3b. AN INSTANT SOLUTION: The writer had foreseen this many years ago, and advised Hellenes to pull the rug from under the feet of the Skopjans, by constitutionally renaming their entire home-country to MACEDONIA, and officially declaring such in the UNO and all other forums. Thus, the covetous Skopjans would have had no ground to stand on ith their fanciful Republica Macedoniya.
3c It was a mistake for Hellenes not to grasp the gist of the aforesaid notion; they were skeptic fearing a likely loss of their greater identity; to allay such fears the term Hellas (Greece could be prefixed on all toponyms (place-names), e.g. Hellas-Thrace, Hellas-Attica, Hellas-Ipiros, Hellas-Delphi, Hellas-Thessaly, etc). But the entire world knows them with several identity names, viz.: Greeks, Romioe, Iones (Yunanis), Hellenes, Byzantines; and, who can take such identities away from them? Macedonians would then be an additional identity generally for all, yet veritable, as this historical legacy generally reflects on all Hellenes.
3d. Yet, while the name dispute is still unresolved, there is still time to make these bold moves. Since the expectation over decades is proven futile that Skopje and the UNO shall resolve this ridiculous dispute, Hellas must change over to the offensive by political faits accomplis. In view of all the unilateral actions and hostile propaganda by Skopje, there is nothing to hinder Hellas’ right to defend its Macedonian legacies by whatever politically pre-empting actions (however drastic).
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
To punish the Hellenes who stole their glorious achievements and distorted their history.
How ridiculous!
Have their senses parted them?
Who are they to do any punishing? But is it them or some foreign sinister influence in this anti-Hellenic hostility? Again, the finger points to the Zionist elements of the USA Administration, of the West, and to their accomplice syndicates.
If to punish anyone:
It is the memory of Great Alexander itself, for his own Hellenic Evidence.
Further-along, please read two versions of HIS [Alexander’s] world acclaimed OATH, in which he vividly implies his Greekness. He invokes no other ethnicity (neither Skopjan), but only the Hellenic (Greek).
There are numerous historically supporting instances for Hellenic Evidence, viz:
a) None of the nations which have welcomed Alexander as liberator has recorded anything contrary to his Macedonian Greekness.
b) He started the Hellenistic era all over the then known world, during which Christ was born, taught, died on the cross, and rose. Nothing like Slavic or Skopjan, as is historically proven that the latter did not appear anywhere near until many centuries after
Christ.
c) The Septuagint Old Testament is translated by Hebrew theologians, under the auspices of Ptolemy in Alexandria Egypt, to Hellenic; which was the predominant culture and language of the then Hellenistic world of Alexander and his successors. Here again, why was it not in Slavic or Skopjan?
d) All names current to the history of that time, of persons, of places, [of tombs], of civilization and sciences, of Europe generally, even of Slavs, of thereafter to-date, do convincingly reflect Hellenistic etymologies -- definitely not Skopjan: where have they been?
e) Great Alexander’s own oath is universally acclaimed as the pre-Christ oath of a Christian who testifies about God as the father of all (not of several quarrelling gods), and the first Hellenic prologue to Universal Human Rights: Outlined below are two quotations of the Oath, downloaded from two electronic sources, which convincingly indicates the Greekness of his Macedonian ethnicity.
Admire and enjoy the reading:
[Incidental request: If any of the readers happens to have the ancient Hellenic version, kindly e-mail it to us.]
The "Oath" of Alexander the Great - (Opis, 324 BC)
By: Stelios Papathemelis
Former
government minister and member of the Macedonian Studies Society
(http://www.qsl.net/sv2ael/sv2ael.files/alexander.htm)
[As rendered in English and in Greek]
"IT IS MY WISH, NOW THAT WARS ARE COMING TO AN END, THAT YOU SHOULD ALL BE HAPPY IN PEACE. FROM NOW ON, LET ALL MORTALS LIVE AS ONE PEOPLE, IN FELLOWSHIP, FOR THE GOOD OF ALL. SEE THE WHOLE WORLD AS YOUR HOMELAND, WITH LAWS COMMON TO ALL, WHERE THE BEST WILL GOVERN REGARDLESS OF THEIR RACE. UNLIKE THE NARROW MINDED, I MAKE NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN GREEKS AND BARBARIANS. THE ORIGIN OF CITIZENS, OR THE RACE INTO WHICH THEY WERE BORN, IS OF NO CONCERN TO ME. I HAVE ONLY ONE CRITERION BY WHICH TO DISTINGUISH THEM VIRTUE.
"FOR ME, ANY GOOD FOREIGNER IS A GREEK AND ANY BAD GREEK IS WORSE THAN A BARBARIAN. IF DISPUTES EVER OCCUR AMONG YOU, YOU WILL NOT RESORT TO WEAPONS BUT WILL SOLVE THEM IN PEACE. IF NEED BE, I SHALL ARBITRATE BETWEEN YOU. SEE GOD NOT AS AN AUTOCRATIC DESPOT, BUT AS THE COMMON FATHER OF ALL AND THUS YOUR CONDUCT WILL BE LIKE THE LIVES OF BROTHERS WITHIN THE SAME FAMILY. I, ON MY PART, SEE YOU ALL AS EQUAL, WHETHER YOU ARE WHITE OR DARK-SKINNED. AND I SHOULD LIKE YOU NOT SIMPLY TO BE SUBJECTS OF MY COMMONWEALTH, BUT MEMBERS OF IT, PARTNERS OF IT. TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, I SHALL STRIVE TO DO WHAT I HAVE PROMISED. KEEP AS A SYMBOL OF LOVE THIS OATH WHICH WE HAVE TAKEN TONIGHT WITH OUR LIBATIONS."
Ο «ΟΡΚΟΣ»
ΤΟΥ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ
(ΟΠΙΣ, 324 π.Χ.)
«ΣΑΣ ΕΥΧΟΜΑΙ ΤΩΡΑ ΠΟΥ ΤΕΛΕΙΩΝΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΠΟΛΕΜΟΙ ΝΑ ΕΙΣΤΕ ΕΥΤΥΧΙΣΜΕΝΟΙ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΕ ΕΙΡΗΝΗ. ΟΛΟΙ ΟΙ ΘΝΗΤΟΙ ΑΠΌ ' ΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΡΑ ΝΑ ΖΗΣΟΥΝ ΣΑΝ ΕΝΑΣ ΛΑΟΣ, ΜΟΝΙΑΣΜΕΝΟΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΚΟΙΝΗ ΠΡΟΚΟΠΗ. ΝΑ ΕΧΕΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΟΙΚΟΥΜΕΝΗ ΠΑΤΡΙΔΑ ΣΑΣ, ΜΕ ΝΟΜΟΥΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΥΣ, ΟΠΟΥ ΘΑ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΑΡΙΣΤΟΙ ΑΝΕΞΑΡΤΗΤΑ ΑΠΌ ΤΗΝ ΦΥΛΗ. ΔΕΝ ΧΩΡΙΖΩ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΥΣ, ΌΠΩΣ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΣΤΕΝΟΜΥΑΛΟΙ, ΣΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΒΑΡΒΑΡΟΥΣ. ΔΕΝ Μ' ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΕΙ Η ΚΑΤΑΓΩΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΩΝ ΟΥΤΕ Η ΡΑΤΣΑ ΠΟΥ ΓΕΝΝΗΘΗΚΑΝ. ΤΟΥΣ ΚΑΤΑΜΕΡΙΖΩ ΜΕ ΜΟΝΑΔΙΚΟ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΟ ΤΗΝ ΑΡΕΤΗ.
«ΓΙΑ ΜΕΝΑ, ΚΑΘΕ ΚΑΛΟΣ ΞΕΝΟΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΚΑΘΕ ΚΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΧΕΙΡΟΤΕΡΟΣ ΑΠΟ ΒΑΡΒΑΡΟ. ΑΝ ΠΟΤΕ ΣΑΣ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΘΟΥΝ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΣ, ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΚΑΤΑΦΥΓΕΤΕ ΣΤΑ ΟΠΛΑ, ΠΑΡΑ ΘΑ ΤΙΣ ΛΥΣΕΤ Ε ΕΙΡΗΝΙΚΑ. ΣΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΓΚΗ ΘΑ ΣΤΑΘΩ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΤΗΣ ΣΑΣ. ΤΟ ΘΕΟ ΔΕΝ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΤΟΝ ΕΧΕΤΕ ΑΥΤΑΡΧΙΚΟ ΚΥΒΕΡΝΗΤΗ, ΑΛΛΑ ΣΑΝ ΚΟΙΝΟ ΠΑΤΕΡΑ ΟΛΩΝ, ΩΣΤΕ Η ΔΙΑΓΩΓΗ ΣΑΣ ΝΑ ΜΟΙΑΖΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΖΩΗ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΝΟΥΝ Τ' ΑΔΕΛΦΙΑ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΟΙΚΟΓΕΝΕΙΑ. ΕΓΩ, ΑΠ΄ ΤΗ ΜΕΡΙΑ ΜΟΥ ΟΛΟΥΣ ΣΑΣ ΘΕΩΡΩ ΙΣΟΥΣ, ΛΕΥΚΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΛΑΨΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΘΑ ΗΘΕΛΑ ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΑΙΣΘΑΝΕΣΤΕ ΜΟΝΟ ΣΑΝ ΥΠΗΚΟΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑΣ ΜΟΥ, ΑΛΛΑ ΝΑ ΝΟΙΩΘΕΤΕ ΟΛΟΙ ΣΑΝ ΜΕΤΟΧΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΕΤΑΙΡΟΙ. ΟΣΟ ΠΕΡΝΑ ΑΠ' ΤΟ ΧΕΡΙ ΜΟΥ ΘΑ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΗΣΩ ΝΑ ΓΙΝΟΥΝ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΥΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΥΠΟΣΧΟΜΑΙ. ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟΝ ΟΡΚΟ ΠΟΥ ΔΩΣΑΜΕ ΑΠΟΨΕ ΜΕ ΣΠΟΝΔΕΣ ΚΡΑΤΗΣΤΕ ΤΟΝ ΣΑΝ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΟ ΑΓΑΠΗΣ.»
__________
Thassos - My Jewel of the Aegean - Alexander's Oath
Thassos – My jewel of the Aegean
The 'Oath' of Alexander the Great
Contact Steve Allan at: (allanovich2nd@aol.com)
(http://www.livingthethassosdream.ecom/6.html)
“It is my wish, now that wars are coming to an end, that you should all be happy in peace. From now on, let all mortals live as one people, in fellowship, for the good of all. See the whole world as your homeland, with laws common to all, where the best will govern regardless of their race. Unlike the narrow minded, I make no distinction between Greeks and barbarians. The origin of citizens, or the race into which they were born, is of no concern to me. I have only one criterion by which to distinguish them virtue.
For me, any good foreigner is a Greek and any bad Greek is worse than a barbarian. If disputes ever occur among you, you will not resort to weapons but will solve them in peace. If need be, I shall arbitrate between yon. See god not as an autocratic despot, but as the common father of all and thus your conduct will be like the lives of brothers within the same family. I, on my part, see you all as equal, whether you are white or dark skinned, and I should like you not simply to be subjects of my commonwealth, but members of it, partners of it. To the best of my ability, I shall strive to do what I have promised. Keep as the symbol of love this oath which we have taken tonight with our libations.”
Author of above statement and compiler of the references:
Convener: Hellenes' Australian Nexus
George Savva Eleftheriades
in collaboration with granddaughter,
Eugenia
__________________________________
George Savva Eleftheriades,
OAM,
CETr,
JP,
New South Wales, Australia
gse@tadaust.org.au
by the Governor of
New South Wales, the Honourable
Gordon Samuels AC; Sydney 8 June 1998).
by the GMS HIRH Prince Juan Arcadio Lascaris Comnenos, from Madrid, 15 April, 2007).
The Order of Australia
Association.
Cause for Embarrassment
[First read all the above]
WHO is it that
causes continuing blemish by implicating American
prestige and credibility?
And,
who currently
fosters the notion that the
population referenced below
has
suddenly since 1944 and after thousands of years become
transformed
to "Macedonian with ancient
roots, culture, and language," whereby such are nowhere to be found in
archaeological, cultural, or linguistic records?
It should be very difficult for at least every clear-thinking American to
comprehend how the
United States of America has been allowed to be led
into and implicated in such a self-degrading ploy.
In whose hands has the Great Nation fallen?
Source:
The document of the U.S. State Department is included in the book of
The document of then U.S. Secretary of Sate Stettinius [Edward Rielly Stettinius, Jr.] during the Roosevelt administration was to inform all Embassies and international public opinion of the following irrefutable truths:
U.S STATE DEPARTMENT
Foreign Relations Vol.VIII
Washington D.C.
Circular Airgram
(868.014/26 Dec. 1944)
The Secretary of State to Certain Diplomatic and Consular Officers*
The following is for your information and general guidance, but not for any
positive action at this time.
The Department has noted with considerable apprehension increasing propaganda
rumors and semi-official statements in favor of an autonomous Macedonia
,emanating principally from Bulgaria, but also from Yugoslav Partisan and other
sources ,with the implication that Greek territory would be included in the
projected state. ”This Government considers talk of Macedonian
“nation”, Macedonian “Fatherland”, or Macedonian “national consciousness “to be
unjustified demagoguery representing no ethnic nor political reality and sees in
its present revival a possible cloak for aggressive intentions against Greece.”
The approved policy of this Government is to oppose any revival of the
Macedonian issue as related to Greece. The Greek section of Macedonia is largely
inhabited by Greeks and the Greek people are almost unanimously opposed to
the creation of a Macedonian state. Allegations of serious Greek
participation in any such agitation can be assumed to be false. This Government
would regard as responsible any Government or group of Governments tolerating or
encouraging menacing or aggressive acts of “Macedonian Forces” against
Greece.
The department would appreciate any information pertinent to this subject which
may come to your attention.
STETTINIUS
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
Is the following
the History that subsequent embarrassing and discredited
manipulation aims to erase?
Source (downloaded):
European Union [EU@HEC.GREECE.ORG] on behalf of
Bill Gatzoulis [billgatz@COMCAST.NET]
From: http://elesme.gr/elesmengl/main.htm
REASONS WHY SKOPJE, THE SOUTHERNMOST FORMER YUGOSLAV
REPUBLIC (FYROM) SHOULD NOT USE THE NAMES "MACEDONIA" AND MACEDONIAN TO DEFINE
ITSELF AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE AND AS NATIONALITY
INTRODUCTION
Ιt is common knowledge the persistent attempts of Skopje, the Southernmost
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, to impose on the international
community, particularly on Greece, the historic Greek names "Macedonia" and
"Macedonian", for their state and national identification
This insolent usurpation of the identity of Macedonians, which is also
identity of Greeks, besides the Greek character of the Name, the Language,
History and Civilization of Macedonia does not surprise us since it has been a
conflicting one for 61 years. However what has taken us by surprise is the
recent recognition of the State of Skopje by the USA under this Greek name.
This recognition is unwise and offensive, at the expense of the Greek
interests, and in any case inconsistent with the USA policy in the past.
Undeniable facts prove that the renaming of Southern Serbia to Macedonia by
TITO, in concert with STALIN, served two objectives : The first one was the
weakening of Serbia and the second and most important one the segregation of
the northern Greek province of Macedonia in order to have access to the Aegean
Sea by gaining control over the port of Thessalonici ; further to the creation
of the Aegean Pseudomacedonia.
It seems that the USA diversified from the position they held in the past.
Specifically the USA made a stand against this action taken by Tito and
responded promptly by circular No 868014/26-12-44, issued by Roosvelt's
Secretary of State, Edward R. Stetinius Jr, who declared the following :
"This government considers that any mention to "Macedonian Nation",
"Macedonian Fatherland" or "Macedonian Identity" is unjustified and demagogic;
it does not represent national of political reality perceiving it, in its
present resurgence, as a probable cover for offensive actions against Greece.
The official policy of this government is to take the necessary steps against
those who will aid Yugoslavia or Bulgaria to raise the "Macedonian Question"
at the exprense of Greece".
This policy was reinforced by the subsequent USA Presidents as well as the
legislative bodies (the Congress and the Senate).
The above mentioned declaration was proved prophetic granted that Tito and
Stalin attempted an attack upon Greece to which the USA reacted in 1947 by
adopting the Truman Doctrine and aid programs to Greece in order to protect
its territorial integrity from communist rule. The above mentioned
attitude/stand was supported among other by United Nations, the Pope John Paul
and Stalin and Dimitrof's confessions.
Further down we will repeat, briefly, the most significant reasons that do not
permit the use of the names "Macedonia" and "Macedonian" by this new State :
[Go to the Source for map located here]
All these arguments cannot stand up to criticism as they are highly questionable in terms of historical, ethnological, cultural and sociological criteria.
The arguments against the use of the names "Macedonia" and "Macedonian" are substantial and when compared with the arguments of the Skopje Officials are overwhelming and determinative.
The invented claims of Skopjan origin are continuously proclaimed by the
Skopje officials not only as a federal State but also and more persistently,
now that is independent States. Though they cannot withstand even the most
elementary criticism as they are untruthful and unjustified, the following
evidence, will prove that the opposing arguments are substantially
overwhelming and determinative.
Macedonia itself, with its milleniums of glory, does not allow the alteration
of its history. Only the names of Aristotle and Alexander the Great and their
contribution to the history of mankind, the first with his wisdom, the latter
with his valor, politics and magnanimity, should have been enough to awaken
all those who try to falsify its history.
Macedonia has always been the most advanced part and bastion of Greece.
All historical authorities agree that the geographical boundaries of ancient
Macedonia were the following :
The inhabitants of this region, the Macedonians, belonged to
one of the older Greek tribes: Their closer relatives were Thessalians,
specifically Magnisians with whom the shared their Aeolian origin. The
language they spoke was one of the older dilects of Greek language with a lot
in common with Aeolian, Arcadian, Cyprian and Mycenian dilects.
Τhe Old Testament, the ancient authors, contemporary researchers, innumerable
inscriptions on statues, graves and steles with Greek names and votive
offerings, thousands of coins, not only in Macedonia but in the rest of Greece
as well as in Libya, Egypt and Asia as far as India, categorically confirm
that Macedonians as Greeks had the same gods and religious worship and that
the Macedonians disseminated their language that is Greek, and the spirit of
Greece all over the world of that time.
As all these evidences are innumerable only a few will be presented.
The Old Testament contains irrefutable and cogent textual
evidences. In one of them, Prophet Daniel, about 200 years before the birth of
Alexander the Great, predicted that "The King of the Medes and the Persians
will be vanquished by a Greek King and that this first and great king will be
succeeded by four kings from the same Kingdom".
The Ancient authors and historians are also giving
innumerable evidence.
The first historical accounts are given by Homer who mentions
in the Iliad the names of various Pelasgian and Greek tribe that lived in
Macedonia.
Stravon says, "of course Macedonia is a part of Greece".
Herodotous writes : "The descendants of Perdicas, the first
king of Macedonians, are Greeks, as they themselves desire, and as I know
myself".
Thucydides mentions that the Macedonians are composed of
various Greek tribes under different kings.
Polybius says : "What and how much honour do Macedonians
deserve who for the greatest part of their lives never ceased fighting against
barbarians for the safety of Greeks".
Arian, in his book "Anabasis of Alexander" mentions that
Alexander the Great, after the victorious battle of Granicus acted as follows
: "He sent to Athens, the foremost city of Greeks, and not to Pella, which was
the capital of Macedonia, three hundred panoplies and other Persian spoils as
a votive offering to Athina with the inscription : "Alexander, son of
Philippos and the Greeks, with the exception of Lacedaemonians, offer these
spoils from the Barbarians dwelling in Asia".
He also says that 2000 Greek mercenaries of the Persians, who were taken
prisoners he sent them captive to Macedonia to work there as slaves: because
though being Greeks they fought against Greece in favor of the barbarians.
Pausanias confirms that Macedonians were members of the
Delphic Amphictiony by saying "In my time Amphictyons were thirty. The regions
of Nicopolis, Macedonia and Thessaly, each sent six representatives" and as it
is well known only Greeks were members of Amphictionies. He also proves that
Macedonians participated in the Olympic Games, where only Greeks could take
part, with many participants and winners.
Johann Gustav Droysen - among other scholars - points out in
his History of Alexander the Great, "both Philip and Alexander disseminated to
the people of Asia not the Macedononian culture, which was never independent,
but the Greek culture".
Some of the innumerable Greek inscriptions on statues, graves
and stelae and thousands of coins, are shown in the following photos.
[Go to the Source for a series of five illustrations located here]
When maps Reveal the Truth
The attempts made by Skopje to provide evidence for their allegations by
using faulse maps did not work. No matter how hard one may try, there are no
maps anywhere in the world edited before 1944, which quote the word
"Macedonia" for any other country or region except for Greece. In 1944, the
first maps edited by the Yugoslavs named Southern Serbia the "Socialist
Republic of Macedonia". This map was later reprinted with the words "Socialist
Republic of» being omitted, and the word "Macedonia" being deleted from Greece
: Hense people using the maps would form the opinion that "Macedonia" lays
only within Yugoslavia and that therefore there is a "Macedonian nation" which
of course has its own language.
The arguments advanced by the Skopjians in favour of their allegations about
the existence of "Macedonian Nation" are demolished in the following
ethnographic and historical maps :
None of these maps, or any other edited before the second World War, makes
any reference to a separate "Macedonian nation" for the simple reason that no
such a nation existed before TITO invented it.
The last six of the above mentioned maps are shown in the following pages :
[Go to the Source for a series of seven maps located here]
There is no Macedonian Language
The attempts made by Skopians to provide evidences that the so called
"Macedonian language" is the idiom spoken around Skopje can hardly persuade
anyone. Their language, with the self-contained Slav tongue, was completely
unknown until 1944 and no matter how hard one may try will find nothing to
prove its existence. The language used by the Slav speaking inhabitants of the
Southern Yugoslavia and southwestern Bulgaria was known to be a dilect of the
Bulgarian language.
After the foundation of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia, for obvious
political reasons an army of philologists and scholars was employed to create
a separate written language.
Taking a Bulgarian dilect as starting point and enhancing it widely from
Greek, Serbian, Russian and other Slav languages, a "literary language", the
so called "Macedonian language" was created and recognized by the Yugoslav
Constitution as one of the country's three official languages. The fact that
there is not even one text, not one inscription, in this language before 1944
proves without doubt that this language has nothing to do with the ancient
Macedonians and their descendants who always spoke Greek.
The fact that the Macedonians spoke the same language as the other Greeks can
also be seen in the work by the Roman historian Livy, who mentions that in the
assembly of Greeks in Aetolia in 200 BC were representatives of Aetolians,
Acarnanians and Macedonians all of whom spoke the same language.
Facts that do not justify ignorance
Beyond the evidence there exist facts that do not justify ignorance and do not permit the minister preparation of Macedonian history. The most significant of these are the following :
[Go to the Source for the Papal Apostolic Letter located here]
All the above prove that Christianity used the Greek language as its
transmitting medium, which had become universal through Alexander and his
successors, in order to be understood by the various nations.
The history and the cultural inheritance of Macedonia as "Hellenistic era" had
a great influence on the humanity history.
As it is mentioned in a 1955 special study by the Institute of Foreign Affairs
and the LUND University of Sweden, the history of Macedonia is not the history
of the Greeks alone but of all Europeans, taking into consideration that the
Macedonians disseminated the Greek civilization to Europe and all over the
world.
The EU Stand
The European Union in December 1991 and June 1992 included in the prerequisites for the recognition of the new State of Skopje the prohibition of the term "Macedonia" as an official name for the new State.
EPILOGUE
Consequently it is unjustifiable and should not be permitted the usage by
the Skopjans of the name "Macedonia" not even in a composite name, for their
state and national determination. Also, it should not be permitted the
deliberate ignorance or overlooking of historical reality by third countries -
big or small, powerful or not - in furtherance of their interests.
We could back down from a claim if we were presented with some record, written
or not of any other evidence dated prior to 1944 which is not of Greek origin.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
Expansion of Western Civilization: from Constantine the Great to Constantinople and Byzantium and onward to America |
NEW BYZANTIUM
is The AMERICAS