U.
S.
A.
and the
WORLD
CULTURE or ECONOMICS ?
Despite
what may be the intended projection to influence public perception of reality;
for any society it is not economics that
shapes its culture. The opposite is true. It is the
cultural underpinning that shapes the economic life of that society.
Regretfully,
the constancy with which reference is made to the notion of a “global
economy” results in the obfuscation of
that which is taking place. The phrase is a mask
used to conceal the actual event and to foster upon public opinion a
distorted
impression of what occurs. It is a method imposed with
regularity in order to convince society to accept a distorted view of itself:
that is, to deprive society of its ability to reason about
its actual condition.
The ultimate goal
of this approach is to rob people of their precious freedom; and thus to
establish control over the life of the
greatest majority. This arrangement in essence is not
an economic but a cultural issue cast in the guise of an imperative economic
event. The economic aspect is but a pivotal tool
toward the achievement of the ulterior goal. Thus, when a people
surrender
their freedom by self-conviction, the loss is far more
devastating than an economic loss. All the wealth in the world loses most
of its meaning if the holder is unable to use it as
desired. And, when society becomes convinced that its material prosperity,
or
else lack—in the absence of culture—is
the only measure of its worth; then that society is a slave to its own
deception and also a
subject to the will of anyone who controls its economic
life.
The concept of
globalization has an exclusive economic focus that lacks the element of the
meaning in human life. It is an
instrument
for
particular
gain within a
reduced quarter
of
the world’s population. Its endless pounding in the minds of people
debases the fundamental conviction of freedom. The
method leads to the disintegration of the balanced economic function of
established societies, lowering the standard of living
on a universal scale through the loss of the industrial base and
intellectual
mass. The resulting economic deterioration by the
imposition of ill-apportioned international trade activities produces the
ultimate
desired result; which is, universal control of a
culturally emaciated world population. This leads to the understanding that
it
is not
the world population who
owns the the global economy;
it is instead the global economy that owns the
world population. Thus,
deterioration or collapse of ethical and moral
integrity, it opens the door to the abuser who enters under the pretext of
help and
accommodation in support of permissiveness. The activity becomes an accelerating downward spiral to the ultimate weakening
and vanishment of social integrity and will—unable to claim even the minimum of a civilized economic standard.
[Mark A. C. Karras, M.A. (Econ.), Ph.D.]
|
Expansion of Western Civilization: from Constantine the Great to Constantinople and Byzantium and onward to America |
NEW BYZANTIUM
is The AMERICAS